Ever since the GamerGate movement arose a few months ago, many claims have been made about how it has hijacked the “gaming community.”
GamerGate’s supposed message promoting ethical games journalism has been dwarfed by its association with harassment, threats and misogyny. Now national media has picked up the story, with a New York Times article making the front page of the paper.
That attention has only amplified the message of so many who bemoan GamerGate’s negative influence on the “gaming community’s” reputation. Just read a few of the top comments on that piece to learn the general public’s reaction to GamerGate (hint: it’s not good).
Clearly, gamers have a long way to go to shake their reputation as basement-dwelling nerds. And many gamers believe GamerGate is to thank for that and have taken to Twitter to voice their concern for this “gaming community.”
Here’s the thing: Older generations might forever lump gamers into a single stereotype. But why are gamers so quick to do the same? Why is there seemingly only one “gaming community” that every schmuck who has ever played Angry Birds is suddenly a member of?
There are so many different types of gamers that classifying them as one group is both unnecessary and inaccurate. Gaming has become such a mainstream hobby that there is room for countless communities under its umbrella.